Coinbase would prefer to stop staking than allow on-chain censorship — Brian Armstrong (

There has been growing concern about whether or not crypto service providers will choose decentralization over censorship in light of the recent Tornado Cash ban and subsequent arrest for the Tornado Cash developer.

This question is becoming more relevant as Ethereum moves from its proof of work (PoW), blockchain, to a consensus-of-stake mining consensus. A user pointed out that 66% of the validators on the Beacon Chain, the Ethereum PoS chain, will be following the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations.

Brain Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase chose to ignore compliance requests and impose protocol level censorship. Armstrong stated:

“It’s an imaginary we hope not to face. We would choose B if we had to. We need to see the larger picture. You may have a better solution (C) or a legal challenge that could lead to a better outcome.

There was increasing speculation about Coinbase, Kraken and other crypto exchanges that are key ETH validaters on the Beacon Chain.

Related to A ban on cash transactions could cause havoc for privacy protocols — Manta cofounder

Many thought that central crypto exchanges would choose to impose protocol-level control over individual transactions of banned crypto mixters like Tornado Cash, rather than blocking them.

OFAC sanctions have made all Tornado Cash transactions illegal. This is the current problem. Experts in decentralized finance (DeFi), however, believe that it has complicated matters. The regulators decided to ban the protocol, instead of sanctioning an address or country.

Experts believe that a ban would dissuade many exchange operators and protocols from engaging in Tornado Cash transactions, which could result in unnecessary censorship.

Opinion writer on 7trade7